Short answer: TS EN 12845+A2:2026 Table 3 (Clause 7.1, EN p.36): HHP1 7.5 mm/min, HHP2 10.0 mm/min, HHP3 12.5 mm/min; for all three the area of operation is 260 m² in a wet or pre-action system and 325 m² in a dry or alternate system. For HHP4 the table says deluge, and the note states that special consideration is required and that deluge systems are not within the scope of this standard.

The High Hazard Process (HHP) class covers occupancies where the material has a high fire load and high flammability and can develop a rapidly spreading or intense fire. EN 12845 divides this class into four groups and collects the design criteria in a single table. Source: TS EN 12845+A2:2026, Clause 6.2.4.1, EN p.32 and Table 3, EN p.36.

Definition and groups: Clause 6.2.4.1

High Hazard, Process covers occupancies where the material has a high fire load and high flammability and can develop a rapidly spreading or intense fire. HHP is divided into four groups: HHP1, HHP2, HHP3 and HHP4 (EN p.32).

Note: HHP4 hazards are generally protected by deluge systems, and those systems are outside the scope of the standard.

Table 3: Design criteria for LH, OH and HHP (Clause 7.1, EN p.36)

Hazard class Design density (mm/min) Area of operation, wet or pre-action (m²) Area of operation, dry or alternate (m²)
LH 2.25 84 Not permitted, OH1 is used
OH1 5.0 72 90
OH2 5.0 144 180
OH3 5.0 216 270
OH4 5.0 360 Not permitted, HHP1 is used
HHP1 7.5 260 325
HHP2 10.0 260 325
HHP3 12.5 260 325
HHP4 deluge (see NOTE) - -

Note to the table: HHP4 requires special consideration; deluge systems are not within the scope of this standard.

Clause 7.1 (EN p.35) gives the condition under which these values apply: the design density shall be not less than the appropriate value given in this clause with all the roof or ceiling sprinklers in the room concerned or those in the area of operation, whichever is the fewer, plus all in-rack and supplementary sprinklers, operating. For HHS systems, 7.2 applies.

Table A.3: HHP occupancies (EN p.126)

Annex A is normative and states that Tables A.1, A.2 and A.3 contain lists of minimum hazard classification, that they are also to be used as guidance for occupancies not specifically mentioned, and that they are to be read together with 6.2 (EN p.124).

HHP1 HHP2 HHP3 HHP4
Oilcloth and linoleum manufacture Lighter manufacture Cellulose nitrate manufacture Firework manufacture
Resin, lamp black and turpentine manufacture Tar distillation Rubber tyres for cars and lorries
Rubber substitute manufacture Garages for buses, empty lorries and railway wagons Manufacture of foamed plastics, foam rubber and foam rubber products with material factor m3 (see Table B.1), excluding m4 (see Table B.1)
Wood wool manufacture Candle and paraffin wax manufacturers
Match manufacturers Paper machine halls
Solvent paint spraying shops Carpet factories with rubber and foamed plastics
Refrigerator factories Saw mills
Printing works Chipboard manufacture (see NOTE)
Cable factories for PP/PE/PS or similar with burning characteristics other than OH3 Paint, colour and varnish manufacture
Injection moulding (plastics) for PP/PE/PS or similar with burning characteristics other than OH3
Plastics factories and plastic products (excluding foamed plastics) for PP/PE/PS or similar with burning characteristics other than OH3
Rubber goods factories, synthetic fibre factories (excluding acrylic)
Rope factories
Carpet factories with unexpanded plastics
Shoe factories with plastics and rubber

Note to the table: additional object protection may be required.

Three frequent confusions are resolved explicitly by this table: match manufacture is in HHP1, not HHP2. Tar distillation is in HHP2, not HHP4. Cellulose nitrate manufacture is in HHP3, not HHP4. Chipboard manufacture is in HHP2.

Pre-calculated systems: Table 7 (Clause 7.3.2, EN p.40)

Clause 7.3.2.1: the water supply shall be able to provide at the highest design point the appropriate flow and pressure specified in Table 7, or as modified by 7.3.2.2 to 7.3.2.5. The total requirement for the running pressure at the control valve set is the sum of the pressure at the design point, the pressure equivalent of the height difference between the design point and the control valve set, and the pressure loss for the flow in the pipework from the control valve set to the design point.

The first three density rows of Table 7 relevant to HHP (EN p.40):

Section Design density (mm/min) Maximum demand flow, wet or pre-action (l/min) Maximum demand flow, dry or alternate (l/min)
(1) Pipe sizes of Tables 32 and 33, K80 7.5 2 300 2 900
(1) 10.0 3 050 3 800
(4) Pipe sizes of Tables 35 and 34, K115 12.5 3 800 4 800

Table 7 also gives the pressure at the highest design point (pd) for areas of operation per sprinkler of 6, 7, 8 and 9 m². For example, in section (1) for 7.5 mm/min, 1.80 bar for 8 m² and 2.25 bar for 9 m²; for 10.0 mm/min, 3.15 and 3.90 bar respectively. In section (3) (pipe sizes of Tables 35 and 34, K80) the same densities give 0.70 and 0.90 bar and 1.25 and 1.60 bar. Note to the table: where there are sprinklers in the array higher than the design point, the static head from the design point to the highest sprinklers should be added to pd.

Flow correction where the area changes

Case Provision Clause
Where the area is smaller than the area of operation The flow in Table 7 may be reduced proportionally, but the pressure at the highest design point for the area shall be equal to the value in the table or be determined by hydraulic calculation 7.3.2.2
Where there are fewer than 48 sprinklers The flow in Table 7 and the appropriate pressure shall be available at the point where the sprinklers enter the HHP or HHS area, at the level of the highest sprinklers 7.3.2.3
Where the area of operation is larger than the HHP/HHS area and adjoins OH The total flow is the sum of the flow for the HHP or HHS part, reduced proportionally in accordance with 7.3.2.2, and the flow for the OH part calculated on the basis of a design density of 5 mm/min 7.3.2.4
Where the area of operation is fed from more than one distribution pipe The pressure at the level of the highest sprinklers of the design points shall be as in Table 7 or be determined by hydraulic calculation; the flow for each distribution pipe is determined proportionally 7.3.2.5

Clauses 7.3.2.6 and 7.3.2.7 (EN p.41) express the proportional correction as a formula: Q2 = Q1 × a2 / a1, where Q1 is the flow in Table 7, a1 the area of operation for the design density (see Table 4) and a2 the required area of operation. The pressure at the design point remains unchanged.

Water supply duration and volume

Clause 8.1.1 (EN p.42) gives the minimum supply durations: LH 30 min, OH 60 min, HHP 90 min, HHS 90 min.

Table 10: Minimum water volume for pre-calculated HHP and HHS systems (Clause 9.3.2.2, EN p.48)

Design density not exceeded (mm/min) Wet systems (m³) Dry systems (m³)
7.5 225 280
10.0 275 345
12.5 350 440
15.0 425 530
17.5 450 560
20.0 575 720
22.5 650 815
25.0 725 905
27.5 800 1 000
30.0 875 1 090

The specified water volume is dedicated to the use of the sprinkler system alone.

For calculated systems, Clause 9.3.2.3 (EN p.48) takes a different route: the minimum effective water volume is calculated by multiplying the maximum demand flow (Qmax) by the duration specified in 8.1.1.

It should be noted that these two routes do not give the same result. Arithmetic check: for HHP1 the wet maximum demand flow in Table 7 is 2 300 l/min; multiplied by the 90 minute duration of 8.1.1 this gives 2 300 × 90 = 207 000 L, that is 207 m³. However, for the same density Table 10 requires 225 m³ in a pre-calculated system. In pre-calculated systems Table 10 is binding. On the dry side, 2 900 × 90 = 261 000 L = 261 m³, whereas Table 10 requires 280 m³.

The same check for HHP2: 3 050 × 90 = 274 500 L = 274.5 m³, and the wet value in Table 10 is 275 m³.

Sprinkler selection and pressure

Layout and installation size

The distinction between HHP and HHS

HHP is a process hazard; HHS is a storage hazard and covers the storage of goods where the limits given in Clause 6.2.3 are exceeded (Clause 6.2.4.2, EN p.32). The classification routes for the two are different:

Annex B is not used to determine an HHP group; it determines Category I-IV through the material factor (M1-M4). The only exception is the reference to Table B.1 in the HHP3 cell of Table A.3: the manufacture of foamed plastics, foam rubber and foam rubber products falls into HHP3 for those with material factor m3, while those with m4 are excluded.

Field note: in mixed premises (for example a factory with an HHP process in one part and HHS storage in another) the two classifications are carried out separately, and the two row extension rule of Clause 6.1 and the mixed flow calculation of 7.3.2.4 are applied together.

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the design density and area of operation for the HHP groups?

TS EN 12845+A2:2026 Table 3 (Clause 7.1, EN p.36): HHP1 7.5 mm/min, HHP2 10.0 mm/min, HHP3 12.5 mm/min; for all three the area of operation is 260 m² in a wet or pre-action system and 325 m² in a dry or alternate system. For HHP4 the table says deluge, and the note states that special consideration is required and that deluge systems are not within the scope of this standard.

Which occupancy falls into which HHP group?

Table A.3 (EN p.126). Examples: in the HHP1 column, oilcloth and linoleum manufacture, resin, lamp black and turpentine manufacture, rubber substitute manufacture, wood wool manufacture, match manufacturers, solvent paint spraying shops, refrigerator factories, printing works, rope factories; in the HHP2 column, lighter manufacture, tar distillation, garages for buses and empty lorries and railway wagons, candle and paraffin wax manufacturers, paper machine halls, carpet factories with rubber and foamed plastics, saw mills, chipboard manufacture, paint, colour and varnish manufacture; in the HHP3 column, cellulose nitrate manufacture, rubber tyres for cars and lorries, manufacture of foamed plastics, foam rubber and foam rubber products with material factor m3; in the HHP4 column, only firework manufacture.

How is the minimum water volume for HHP found?

In pre-calculated systems Table 10 (Clause 9.3.2.2, EN p.48) is used: for 7.5 mm/min, wet 225 m³ and dry 280 m³; for 10.0 mm/min, 275 and 345 m³; for 12.5 mm/min, 350 and 440 m³. In calculated systems, in accordance with Clause 9.3.2.3, the maximum demand flow Qmax is multiplied by the duration in 8.1.1; for HHP that duration is 90 minutes.

Which K factors may be used for HHP ceiling sprinklers?

Table 37a (Clause 14.2.1, EN p.104): for HHP and HHS ceiling or roof sprinklers, conventional or spray type with K 80, 115 or 160 where the design density is up to 10 mm/min, and conventional or spray type with K 115 or 160 above 10 mm/min. K factors above K160 are not covered by EN 12845-1.

What is the minimum discharge pressure at HHP sprinklers?

Clause 13.4.4 (EN p.102): 0.50 bar in HHP and HHS, excluding in-rack sprinklers. This value is compared with the pressure required to give the density specified in 13.4.1, and the higher of the two applies.

References

SprinkCalc — Fire Sprinkler Design Across Three Standards

SprinkCalc covers hazard classification, design density and area, K-factor selection, water demand and hydraulic calculations for NFPA 13, FM Global and BS EN 12845 in a single iOS app, and exports a professional PDF report.

Download SprinkCalc on the App Store

MEP Calc — 86+ Engineering Calculators

MEP Calc bundles 86+ engineering modules in one iOS app: 21 fire calculations plus heating, cooling, HVAC, plumbing, steam and natural gas.

Download MEP Calc on the App Store
Standards & References

TS EN 12845+A2:2026 (EN 12845:2015+A2:2026) Fixed firefighting systems — Automatic sprinkler systems — Design, installation and maintenance; TS EN 12845-2:2025 (EN 12845-2:2024) ESFR and CMSA sprinkler systems. Every figure in this article is taken from the published standard text; clause, table and page references are listed under References. General information only, not a substitute for the standard or for a design review.

FS

Fatih Selvi

Mechanical engineer and software developer with field experience in MEP and fire protection, working actively with NFPA, FM Global and BS EN 12845 on site projects.